As
authorities in Britain scrambled to respond to the knife and truck
attacks in the heart of London Saturday night, President Trump’s
immediate response was to publicly demand the courts reinstate his
executive order restricting travel from six largely Muslim nations. “We
need to be smart, vigilant and tough,” tweeted Trump at about 7 p.m.
Eastern Time — before news outlets had been able to confirm any
significant details about the incident. “We need the courts to give us
back our rights. We need the Travel Ban as an extra level of safety!”
The
Justice Department last week asked the Supreme Court to reinstate the
president’s executive order, appealing a lower court’s ruling that
upheld a nationwide block of it.
Throughout
the legal setbacks the Trump administration has faced on the issue is a
consistent theme: judges have pointed to the words of both the
president and his advisors in order to rule that the policy has more to
do with religious animus toward Muslims than protecting national
security.
Central
to the administration’s case has been the claim that the order is not a
ban but rather a temporary change of vetting rules designed to protect
national security. Press secretary Sean Spicer neatly summed up their
case in January, shortly after the chaotic rollout of the original
policy. “It’s not a Muslim ban. It’s not a